Blood diamonds, also known as conflict diamonds, are sourced from war zones and sold to finance armed conflicts against governments. They often lead to human rights abuses and environmental degradation. In contrast, the regulated diamond industry adheres to ethical mining practices, ensuring fair labor conditions, environmental responsibility, and minimal negative impact on society. It focuses on transparency, certification, and responsible sourcing to offer consumers diamonds with a clean origin. This industry supports local economies and aims to eliminate the ethical and environmental concerns associated with blood diamonds, providing a more ethical and sustainable choice for consumers.

Questions
Where are most of these countries located-
they are located in west Africa on the coast. they are all boarding each other.
What do they have in common-
they are all countries in poverty and are involved in slavery.
who collects the diamonds-
the rebels.
Who make all the money-
the rebels.
the places where all diamonds come from-

Modern slavery
Facts-
There are 49.9 million slaves in the word
The country with the most slaves is india with 11 million
We have 8,000 slaves in new zealand.
1.electronics – us $243.6B
2.Garments – us $147.9B
3.palm oul – us $19.7B
4.solar panels – us $14.8B
5.textiles – us $12.7B
in social studies we looked at slavery and how much slavery we have in New Zealand.
In social studies we have been looking at mining in Australia and New Zealand and how it affects different things like environment, culture ect-
Research Question: How Does Mining Affect New Zealand?
- Why Do We Mine in New Zealand?
- Why does New Zealand mine?
Mining contributes socially, environmentally, and economically to the benefit of New Zealand.
- How does mining help New Zealand’s money?
The Mining industry in New Zealand delivered over $490,000 of GDP(gross domestic product) per filled job in the year to March 2023.
- What kinds of mining happen in New Zealand, and where do they happen?
This method of mining is mainly used for hard rock gold, iron sand, aggregate or coal mining in New Zealand. Open pit mines involve digging back the land to expose the mineral to be mined. The Martha gold mine in Waihi and Stockton opencast coal mine near Westport are examples of open pit mining.
- How has mining changed in New Zealand over time?
The total value of mining output (excluding oil and gas) increased steadily after the Second World War, and exceeded $1 billion for the first time in 2004.
- Harm to the Environment
- What bad things happen to the environment because of mining in New Zealand, like trees getting cut down and animals losing their homes?
Mining can cause erosion, sinkholes, loss of biodiversity, or the contamination of soil, groundwater, and surface water by chemicals emitted from mining processes.
- What rules and plans does New Zealand have to stop the environment from getting hurt by mining?
net zero emissions of all greenhouse gasses other than biogenic methane by 2050
- Are there ways to fix and make better the places damaged by mining?
Advanced land rehabilitation techniques, coupled with low-impact mining methods and reuse of mine waste,
- Effects on People and Culture
- How does mining affect the Māori people and their special lands and things?
detrimental impact on the cultural and spiritual wellbeing of Māori.
- What special things and feelings do people connect to the places where they mine in New Zealand?
Chemical contamination on land and in water, sediments in waterways, and loss of riparian vegetation
- Do the Māori people have a say in what happens with mining?
The involvement of Māori in mining is not new. Since Polynesian ancestors first came to Aotearoa New Zealand, Māori have understood the value of extracting non-renewable resources. Māori quarried rock for tools, weapons, trade, demarcation, gardening and ornamentation.
- Money and Jobs
- How does mining make money and jobs for people and the places where they mine?
the company must have a higher return from selling the minerals than their total expenditures by at least 10-20%
- Is it good for New Zealand’s money, or does it bring problems for the future?
Most mining currently occurs in Otago, Southland, the West Coast, Northland, Taranaki, and the Waikato. Mining is an intensive use of land which may create permanent fixtures, such as overburden dumps and tailing dams. Mining has the potential to contaminate land and water, and restrict any future uses of the land.
- What plans are there to make sure everyone gets a fair share of money from mining?
“The Green Party’s plan to ask the wealthiest 0.7 to pay their fair share through a wealth tax would pay for an Income Guarantee that would benefit over 3.7 million people. Under our plan, 95 percent of New Zealanders would receive a tax cut and have more money in their back pockets to cover life’s essentials.
- Safety and Health
- What dangers and problems come with different kinds of mining in New Zealand?
Mining has the potential to contaminate land and water, and restrict any future uses of the land. In recent times there has been more emphasis on minimizing the impacts of mining operations and rehabilitation of retired mine sites.
- How do they try to keep people safe and healthy while mining and in nearby places?
Stringent ventilation systems, personal protective equipment (PPE), and routine health monitoring are critical for safeguarding miners against these risks. Additionally, ongoing research and development in filtration technologies and better ventilation designs aim to minimize exposure to harmful substances.
- Can we learn from accidents or problems in mining to make it safer?
analyzing mining accidents enhances safety protocols and prevention measures.
- Taking Care of the Future
- Are there enough special things like gold, coal, or minerals for the future in New Zealand?
Macraes Operation on the South Island of New Zealand is the country’s largest active gold producing mine,
- What are they doing to make mining better for the Earth, like using things again and again?
Reusing Mining Waste
- What will happen with mining in New Zealand in the future?
The Crown Minerals Act no longer requires the Government to actively “promote” prospecting, exploration, and mining of minerals like climate polluting fossil fuels.
- Looking at Other Countries
- How is New Zealand’s mining like or different from other countries that do similar things?
Open pit mining
This method of mining is mainly used for hard rock gold, iron sand, aggregate or coal mining in New Zealand.
- What can New Zealand learn from what other countries did to make mining better?
New Zealand can improve mining practices by studying successful strategies from other nations worldwide.
- Are there good ideas from other countries that can work in New Zealand?
People also contact employers directly. It is often the most successful approach. Whichever approach, or approaches, you use, you will find most employers here are happy to consider people from overseas if there are no people in New Zealand available to fill the post.
Should natural resources from Antarctica be mined?
Read the following blog posts. They contain a range of ideas and views about whether or not the resources of Antarctica should be mined
Blog post 1
Antarctica is one of the few places on the entire globe where science has been allowed to succeed. Even though several countries have made territorial claims on the continent, no one lives in Antarctica on a permanent basis. There are scientists at research stations that are manned for the entire year. If you make the decision to mine the natural resources, you will be opening the floodgates for various companies.
There was another time that people decided to use Antarctica for its resources. This had devastating effects. Both on the environment and animal life. Whaling stations were set up in the 19th and 20th centuries. They were profitable for the owners. Profitable to the point that several types of animals were hunted almost to the point of extinction. Is there any reason to think that the mining industry would treat the fragile environment any differently?
Blog post 2
What do we really have to gain from drilling in such remote places? Of course a few people may be able to line their pockets by doing so, hence the push by some to open up places like Antarctica, but how does this help everyone else? What kind of environmental damage will this do and how much will we expect to get from such mining? It seems to me that mining in Antarctica won’t solve our energy problems at all. Most likely it will cause far more problems rather than solve anything. Mining Antarctica and places like it won’t solve the energy issues we face today nor will it give our economy any long term benefits.
Antarctica holds most of the earth’s fresh water reserves and ice – both freshwater and ice are things the human race depends on in order to survive on this planet. Why should anyone believe that our fresh water is safe if drilling and mining is allowed in Antarctica? What about the ice that cools the planet and keeps it from becoming an unlivable hothouse?
Blog post 3
Antarctica is loaded with natural resources and minerals such as iron ore, gold, nickel, copper, chromium, and platinum among others. According to the Antarctic Treaty, mining is prohibited. But that could change as the world demands more and more metals to feed a hungry industry and for technology.
Extreme care would have to be taken if any sort of mining were to take place on this frozen land. The ecosystem is just too fragile there, even though not many living things are native to Antarctica. Penguins come to mind, but they live mainly on the coast and the Weddell Sea. The question is does it make economic sense to invest the time and money to work there?
If proper precautions were to take place, then maybe, just maybe a small trial run of mining could happen.
3
Blog post 4
If we have the technology to mine in the Antarctic then that’s exactly where we should be heading. The Antarctic is just one of several places that are inhospitable to most life. We should be taking advantage of the opportunity to develop mining and drilling in areas where the destruction will not have the same effect as it would in more populated areas.
We should be exploring and exploiting the resources of those areas of the world where the impact of our presence would be minimal. It’s a situation of realising that human society depends on these resources to maintain itself. Without taking advantage of natural resources, life as we currently know it, ends.
Until we can find better, cleaner, ways to support our society, we need to keep the damage to a minimum. If that means damaging a mostly barren ecosystem (like glacial Antarctica) to protect viable ecosystems (like the Amazon rainforest) then I am all for it.
TASK 1:
Identify whether or not the views expressed in each of the blogs are FOR or AGAINST the mining of resources in Antarctica.
Complete the For and Against Mining column of the chart on page 4 with your choices.
TASK 2:
Which of the following people might have written each of the blogs?
- Scientist
- Oil Company Executive
- Politician
- Environmentalist
Complete the Possible Blog Writer column of the chart on page 4 with your choices.
TASK 3:
Highlight the reasons for the views expressed in each blog.
Write a summary of these reasons in the Reasons for Point of View column of the chart on page 4.
TASK 4:
What do you think about the mining of resources in Antarctica?
In the space provided at the bottom of page 4, write your own blog on this issue and then copy paste your words and blog it on edublogger.
4
Fill this table in from the above information
| Blog |
For or Against Mining |
Possible Blog Writer |
Reasons for Point of View |
| 1 |
Against mining |
Scientist |
Because they’re talking about if you mine natural resources you will be opening floodgates for various companies. Also they stated that several animals were hunted to the point of extinction. |
| 2 |
Against |
Environmentalist |
Because they are saying that we aren’t really gaining anything from mining. They’re saying they protect the environment and care about it more than money. It won’t save our world’s energy problems and it’ll cause more problems mining in artica. |
| 3 |
for mining |
politician |
According to the Antarctic Treaty, mining is prohibited. But that could change as the world demands more and more metals to feed a hungry industry and for technology.Most likely it will cause far more problems rather than solve anything. Mining Antarctica and places like it won’t solve the energy issues we face today nor will it give our economy any long term benefits. |
| 4 |
for mining |
Oil mining executive |
If we have the technology to mine in the Antarctic then that’s exactly where we should be heading. The Antarctic is just one of several places that are inhospitable to most life. We should be taking advantage of the opportunity to develop mining and drilling in areas where the destruction will not have the same effect as it would in more populated areas. We should be exploring and exploiting the resources of those areas of the world where the impact of our presence would be minimal.Without taking advantage of natural resources, life as we currently know it, ends. We need to keep the damage to a minimum. |
Blog post 5 (My Blog)
I am very much against mining in Antarctica because it jeopardises one of the world’s last untouched wildernesses. Antarctica’s pristine environment is vital for global ecological balance and scientific research. Allowing mining there would disrupt fragile ecosystems, harm unique wildlife, and accelerate climate change. We must prioritise its preservation over short-term economic gains.
Mining in Antarctica poses a grave environmental threat. It risks irreversible damage to pristine ecosystems, disrupts wildlife, and releases pollutants in a region crucial to climate regulation. Protecting this unique and fragile environment is essential for the well-being of our planet and future generations.
Wealth disparity
The past few weeks we have been learning about wealth disparity in social studies.
we had to choose from one of the goals to help with climate change, poverty and staving people. the goal we chose was to life on land. life on land is protecting the ecosystem and promoting substantiated and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Life on land can affect how rich or poor people are. It’s because some people have more access to land, education, and jobs than others. This can make some communities wealthier and others not so wealthy. When people don’t have enough land and resources for farming, they can stay poor, which stops the economy from growing. To fix this, we can make fair land rules and give everyone a chance to learn, which can make society more fair and balanced.
